Last updated on June 25th, 2024 at 08:47 am
- Driving The News: Health Ministry spokesperson defends Minister Somsak Thepsuthin against allegations of political bias in cannabis regulation.
- Why It Matters: The controversy over cannabis regulation affects public perception and policy direction regarding cannabis use in Thailand.
- The Big Picture: Ensuring balanced cannabis policies requires considering both medical benefits and potential social impacts.
BANGKOK, THAILAND – Trichada Sritada, spokesperson for the Ministry of Public Health, has responded to recent allegations made by Supachai Jaisamut, an advisor to the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Interior, ANUTIN CHARNVIRAKUL. Supachai accused Health Minister SOMSAK THEPSUTHIN of only listening to anti-cannabis groups and pushing to reclassify cannabis as a narcotic without considering broader perspectives.
Trichada defended Minister Somsak, emphasizing that he has consistently listened to all viewpoints, including both supporters and opponents of cannabis use. “It is essential for society to move forward by considering diverse opinions. Minister Somsak has weighed the benefits and drawbacks thoroughly, reflecting a balanced approach,” she said.
The spokesperson highlighted that the ongoing debate over cannabis legalization has been contentious since its decriminalization in the previous administration. Efforts to pass comprehensive cannabis legislation faced opposition and ultimately failed in the last parliamentary session, despite strong advocacy from the Bhumjaithai Party.
Trichada stressed that reclassifying cannabis as a narcotic would follow a meticulous process involving multiple government agencies, including the Ministry of Public Health, the Ministry of Interior, and the Office of the Narcotics Control Board (ONCB). She noted that this collaborative approach ensures thorough consideration of public health, safety, and economic implications.
Minister Somsak has stated that any decision regarding cannabis will be based on reliable data and scientific evidence. He remains open to input from all stakeholders and aims to align policies with the government’s commitment to using cannabis for medical and health purposes, as outlined by Prime Minister SRETTHA THAVISIN.
Trichada also addressed Supachai’s comments as politically inappropriate and potentially misleading to the public. “Such statements create unnecessary confusion and conflict within society. We must focus on constructive dialogue and informed decision-making,” she concluded.
The Ministry of Public Health continues to emphasize that the primary goal is to ensure that cannabis use benefits public health and the economy without compromising safety. The debate over cannabis regulation remains a critical issue, with significant implications for Thailand’s future policies.
Contributing Sources: Thai Rath
